Friday, April 9, 2010
Shabbat shalom!
At this point we learn:
Now Aaron’s sons Nadav and Avihu each took his fire pan, put fire in it, and laid incense on it; and they offered before the Lord alien fire, which God had not enjoined upon them. And fire came forth from the Lord and consumed them; thus they died at the instance of the Lord (Leviticus 10:1-2).
In short, Aaron’s two sons – who themselves were priests and therefore authorized to make offerings in the mishkan – were punished by God for offering “alien fire.” The commentators ask, what is “alien fire”? There are a number of possible answers. First, it is possible that the action that they performed – burning incense – was not something that was supposed to be done in the mishkan. It was an improper act. Second, it is possible that the act, itself, was acceptable, but it was performed the wrong way – either at the wrong time (when it was not prescribed) or by the wrong people (Aaron’s sons, rather than the High Priest – Aaron, himself). Third, it is possible that the right offering was performed in a technically correct way, but the brothers were drunk, making their ritual inappropriate because they could not perform it with clarity of mind and intent. Fourth, it is possible that the right offering was performed in the right way, but that a particular attitude accompanied the brothers’ ritual: they assumed a degree of importance they did not deserve. Either they displaced Moses and Aaron from their rightful positions of leadership, or they believed they could perform the offering better than their elders, or they schemed inappropriately about when they would become the legitimate leaders of the people after the deaths of Moses and Aaron.
What did Nadav and Avihu do wrong? It is impossible to know for certain, but what is clear is that their actions did not promote the holiness of the mishkan. They did not make the mishkan set apart, distinct, and important. They behaved in a way that diminished the holiness of the mishkan.
Final questions: did the punishment fit the crime? Ought God to have punished them so severely for offering this “alien fire”? What about the fact that this was the first day that the mishkan was even in use – it had just been dedicated? Was the “alien fire” offered inadvertently, because the brothers did not know the proper rituals yet? These questions remain and weigh heavily on us, as we attempt to know how to bring holiness into our own lives today.
How do we answer these questions? Let’s ponder the answers together. Post your responses here and we can discuss this as a community.
Shabbat shalom.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Shabbat shalom!
This week we begin reading Sefer Vayikra – the Book of Leviticus, which is the third book of the Torah. It is sometimes difficult to look at the opening chapters and find meaning in the value and purpose of sacrificing animals in service to God: slaughtering and burning the animals, sprinkling their blood around the altar, and becoming cleansed of our sins. The rabbis teach us that traditionally, young children begin their study of the Torah with Sefer Vayikra because they are pure and the sacrifices are pure. Therefore, it stands to reason, children would have an easier grasp of the meaning of the sacrifices. By extension, it seems that adults would have a more difficult time with the concept.
How do we, as adults, make sense of the sacrificial system prescribed by our sacred Torah? Not by dismissing it as archaic. Not by calling it unenlightened. And not by lauding its perfection, either. Rather, we acknowledge the power of ritual and realize that our ancestors needed a way to express their remorse about misdeeds performed and their appreciation of what is holy in our world. Today, we do not use the sacrificial tradition of our ancestors to express these things. We do benefit, however, from their role modeling when we allow ritual practices to infuse meaning into the daily experiences of our lives. We mark holiness in time when we celebrate holidays; we note significant moments in life through life cycle rituals; and we infuse our lives with purpose by observing rituals in our daily behavior.
The message of this week’s Torah reading is clear: holiness exists when we allow it to enter our consciousness. Our job is to let it in. How do you do it? Share your thoughts, reactions and ideas here.
Shabbat shalom.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Shabbat Shalom!
If these sound like difficult or impossible questions, then know that you are in good company. None other than our great teacher and leader, Moses, felt equally confused. In this week’s Torah reading, parashat Ki Tissa, Moses says to God:
“See, You say to me, ‘Lead this people forward,’ but You have not made known to
me whom You will send with me. Further, You have said, ‘I have singled you out
by name, and you have, indeed, gained My favor.’ Now, if I have truly gained
Your favor, pray let me know your ways, that I may know You and continue in Your
favor…” (Exodus 33:12-13)
God replies that it is impossible for a human being to comprehend God fully, but that it will be possible for Moses to develop a better understanding of some of the most profound qualities of God. Moses will thus be inspired as he grows into his leadership role.
By this point, Moses has shattered the two stone tablets of the covenant after seeing the Israelites worshipping the golden calf. God summons him back to the top of Mount Sinai to receive a second set of tablets to replace the shattered ones. When Moses returns, the Torah says, “the Lord came down in a cloud; he stood with him there, and [he] proclaimed the name Lord” (Exodus 34.5, italics added). Apparently, Moses and God met at the top of the mountain; and for symbolic purposes, we might imagine that this is the half-way point between God’s domain (the heavens) and Moses’ domain (the earth). Then, the verse continues, “he stood with him there”, but who did the standing with whom? Did God stand with Moses, or did Moses stand with God? Of course, the practical outcome is the same (they stood together), but what is the intent of the verse? And further, who “proclaimed the name Lord” – God or Moses? The traditional commentators are divided: some say the subject is God and others say it is Moses. I believe that the answer lies somewhere in between. Namely, I think the text is intentionally vague, in order to convey that each one is standing with the other, and that they are standing together, unified by their quest for connection with one other. And then, just possibly, they both call out the name of God in unison.
If this is indeed the case, then what we learn is that God seeks closeness with us just as we yearn for a connection with God. In order for that relationship to work – just as in any relationship – both partners must demonstrate their willingness to turn to each other, to desire each other, and to understand each other. So may it be as we search for God’s presence in our lives each and every day.
Shabbat shalom.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Shabbat shalom!
This, unfortunately, is a story that has repeated itself numerous times throughout Jewish history – that of a political leader who does not like the Jews, usually just because we are different in some ways from our neighbors. We understand that it is possible to live as Jews within a broad, diverse society. We know that it is possible to draw a balance between our interests in “secular” life and Jewish heritage. Our loyalties to both are not compromised by our commitment to either.
Purim reminds us that not everyone perceives us the way we perceive ourselves, and so the world is not always a safe place. And though we should not live in fear and paranoia, we should be vigilant in preserving freedom and understanding for all groups in our society, so that we, too, may enjoy the benefits of the same freedom and understanding.
Shabbat shalom, and hag Purim sameah!
Friday, February 19, 2010
Shabbat Shalom
The classic commentators ask the following question: if the Israelites are to construct a sanctuary, why does God express an intention to dwell among them (referring to the community), rather than within it (alluding to the sanctuary, itself)? The wording seems wrong, but of course, it never is. Rather, it instructs us specifically regarding two things: first, defining the role of each individual in creating holy space, and second, locating the presence of God within the community.
In terms of the first, the text makes clear that each Israelite is expected to contribute one-half of a shekel – the same amount for each person. This teaches us that everybody must share equally in the process of creating the mishkan (tabernacle/sanctuary), and that nobody is entitled to a greater share of the honor of participation by virtue of his or her available resources. I would propose a slight refinement to this guideline: each member of the community has a unique ability to contribute to the growth of the community. For some, it will be financial capacity, for others, energy and hard work, and yet for others, knowledge, wisdom and talent. In some ideal sense, it would be wonderful for each individual to contribute extensively, without comparing the contributions of one to the contributions of the other. Further, each of us should feel needed and necessary in promoting the overall welfare of our community.
This leads to the second point: the text teaches us that God’s presence will dwell within our midst if we do the work of constructing holy space. To be sure, God does not need a physical structure to live in, and such a thing is even impossible to imagine. Rather, we learn that when we invite holiness into our lives – by creating distinction and meaning within our places, our relationships, and the moments in our lives – we invite God to be present with us. The magic of what is eternal and true can abide with us in everything we do and everywhere we go.
This coming week, think about what special gifts you have to offer to the community and to those around you, and what you can do to bring God’s presence – or holiness in some fashion – into your life.
I hope you will share your thoughts and reflections here.
Shabbat shalom.
Shabbat Shalom
For some people, the answer lies in the Torah, and for others, it makes more sense to intuit the answer from life’s experiences – perhaps some system of universal morality, for example (there are other ways, as well). If we look in the Torah, where do we find the answer? An easy first step is to read the Ten Commandments, which are part of last week’s Torah reading. This week, we read parashat Mishpatim, which consists of a very long list of instructions – mitzvot – that God instructs us to perform in our daily lives. The question is, how do these mitzvot rank in comparison to the Ten Commandments? Were they intended as clarification or elaboration, or possibly just as an afterthought?
At first glance, it appears that God delivers the instructions of just the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai, but if so, where do the rest of these mitzvot come from? Rashi, citing earlier commentaries, notices the first words of this week’s Torah reading: “And these are the laws that you shall place before them…” (Exodus 21:1). Why, he wonders, does God begin speaking to Moses here with the word “and”? It is because the following laws are intended to supplement the first ten that were already enumerated. In other words, Revelation – which begins at Mount Sinai – continues throughout all generations. It is not a one-time event, but the beginning of a relationship that continues for all time. We look back on the experience of our ancestors at Mount Sinai as the basis for a continuing relationship with God as we strive constantly to know, understand, and draw nearer to God. The instructions – or mitzvot – form the basis of Jewish tradition, not because they are exhaustive in nature, but because they stimulate our quest for what is right and what is true in the world – things we sometimes attribute to God.
Therefore, God encourages us to enter into relationship. God initiates that relationship at Mount Sinai (actually, long before that, in many ways – but in a formal sense through the Revelation), and then the relationship evolves and matures through time. Where do the rest of the mitzvot come from – God or human beings who seek to elaborate upon the content of the original message? Either way, Jewish practice consists of much more than just the original Ten Commandments from last week’s parashah. In every generation, we seek to discover the meaning of God’s presence in our lives, and the choices that we make result in the further articulation of the mitzvot. Maybe they come from God, perhaps from us. Possibly from a partnership between us and God.
Whatever it is, the Torah and all the rest of Jewish tradition has come to us from the generations past. It is ours to cherish, to preserve and to pass on once again, because it encourages us to ponder exactly this question: what does God want from us? Our passion to discover the answer connects us to our ancestors, who asked the same question, and to our descendants, who will ask the same question in generations to come.
Sometimes, the magic is in the question, even if the answer is elusive.
Shabbat shalom.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Shabbat Shalom
We are confronted with this issue this week in Parashat Yitro, which tells of the Israelites at the base of Mount Sinai when they witness the presence of God and receive God’s Instruction. The Torah is explicitly clear that what the people observe is the trembling of the earth, thunder and lightning, fire and smoke, loud noise and the sound of trumpets, and clouds covering the top of the mountain. Somewhere in the midst of that multi-sensory experience, we assume, is the presence of God. But later in the Bible we learn of a totally opposite description of God’s presence when God appears to the prophet Elijah (I Kings 19):
And lo, the Lord passed by. There was a great and mighty wind, splitting mountains and shattering rocks by the power of the Lord; but the Lord was not in the wind. After the wind – an earthquake; but the Lord was not in the earthquake. After the earthquake – fire, but the Lord was not in the fire. And after the fire, a still, small voice [the voice of God].
So which is it? How is God’s presence experienced? In the great noise and chaos of Mount Sinai, in the time of Moses or in the still quiet of Mount Horeb (another name for Mount Sinai, no less!) in the time of Elijah?
Each of us experiences God’s presence differently, and we even experience it differently at different moments in time. What unifies us when we say the words of Shema Yisrael, declaring the one-ness and uniqueness of God, is not that we all accept the same description of God, but rather that we agree that God’s presence is unique and unparalleled in the universe (whatever that might mean). Does God hear and answer our prayers? Does God intervene in our daily lives? Does God have a physical form? Does God speak? These questions challenge us and they are ultimately unanswerable (by definition – that’s what makes God transcendent, beyond anything that human beings can know or relate to completely). However, the mystery that is God cannot paralyze us, as it did my student in the high school Bible class. It cannot hold us back, because what we do know to be true is that there is a Force that brought the world into existence, a Reason that it continues to exist, and a Purpose that compels us to make every day of our lives count. That Force, that Reason, that Purpose – we call it God. Moreover, we know that we are Jews because we have inherited a rich and complex tradition and history from our forebears, and that experience originated at Mount Sinai 3,200 years ago, no matter what it is that may have occurred there. The Israelites experienced God at Sinai. We experience God every day. Not a man, not a cloud, not a lightning bolt. God.
Now go and seek the meaning of God’s presence in your life.
Shabbat shalom.